Intellectual freedom and its relevance
Beyond my role as a librarian, why do I care about free speech? These data can suggest that intellectual freedom is not a very significant issue for academic libraries.
Librarians may confidentially share information with OIF employees about issues occurring in their library or community. North Kansas City Public Library Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.
Nye, Valerie ; Barco, Kathy eds. In these reflections, librarians time-and-time again commented on the strengths and weaknesses of libraries' collection development policies; and advocated for having an up-to-date policy that is read and understood by the entire library staff Nye; Barco, This may be acceptable—after all, most challenges occur in public and school libraries.
The document usually begins with a description of the community that the library serves and outlines the diversity found in the community. Where charges are necessary, a free or low-cost alternative e.
About a dozen respondents quoted this ALA definition or explicitly referred to it. The privacy of library users is and must be inviolable.
Intellectual freedom q & a
Chicago: American Library Association Editions, p. An item is "banned" when those materials are removed American Library Association, Methodology: This article will review the documents that describe the role libraries have in providing and protecting intellectual freedom. Another possible interpretation from the data here is that intellectual freedom, as it is portrayed by the ALA, is not particularly important in academic libraries. The purpose of this statement is to outline how and where intellectual freedom principles fit into an academic library setting, thereby raising consciousness of the intellectual freedom context within which academic librarians work. The Pikes Peak Library District provides good examples of language and procedures for requests for reconsideration. Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights A strong intellectual freedom perspective is critical to the development of academic library collections and services that dispassionately meet the education and research needs of a college or university community. Douglas affirms that "safety of our civilization lies in making freedom of thought and freedom of speech vital, vivid features of life" and condemns "[r]estriction of free thought and free speech," labeling it "the most dangerous of all subversions," and an "un-American act. Well-written reconsideration policies include procedures that patrons must follow to make a formal challenge, and the steps the library staff must follow once a formal request for reconsideration has been received. Intellectual freedom is about living curiously and coming up with new solutions to problems.
based on 73 review